Discourse Strategies of Expressions of Opinions in Radio Talks
نویسندگان
چکیده
Media discourse exhibits a variety of features which are similar to everyday conversations, on one hand, and more institutional forms of verbal interaction on the other. In investigating media interaction, we can observe how media communication affects the attitudes and opinions of society through the way it presents people and issues. Therefore, there is a need to look at why certain utterances occur in speech and to analyze why participants in media discourse have certain preferences for producing such utterances. The aim of the study is to analyze how Malaysian speakers of English engage in exchanges of speech in media talk when expressing opinions, and to investigate the strategies of expressing agreement or disagreement to the topic under discussion. The theoretical framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) (Sacks, 1992) on recorded talk in natural settings of social interaction, as well as the application of CA to the study of talk in media setting (Hutchby, 2006) are adopted for the study. These two approaches are relevant in investigating how speakers engage in exchanges of speech or turn-taking in the on-going interaction, in relation to agreement and disagreement sequences and strategies, as well as in exploring the linguistic aspects of media talk.
منابع مشابه
A Study on Morpho-Syntactic Patterns: A Cohesive Device in Some Persian Live Sport Radio and TV Talks
Morpho-syntactic patterns device encompasses a subcategory of the cohesive devices that assists hearers to have an adequate mental representation for understanding speech. This article investigates the morpho-syntactic patterns employed in some Persian live sport radio and TV programs adapting Dooley and Levinsohn’s theoretical and analytical framework. The research data includes around 30,000 ...
متن کامل(Un)Translatability of Persian Idiomatic Expressions to English in Political Discourse
The present study sought to investigate the extent to which Persian idiomatic expressions would influence the western translators' strategies in providing the ultimate product in English, and it also attempted to uncover the underlying assumptions in target text, then to suggest some weighty strategies to overcome difficulties with translation. For this purpose, the data was analyzed within the...
متن کاملA Discourse-Historical Analysis of Two Iranian Presidents’ Speeches at the UN General Assembly
The present study compared speeches by Iranian President Rouhani, following a moderate political ideology, and his predecessor Ahmadinejad, a seemingly conservative/ principalist president, at the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. The discourse-historical approach was employed to analyze the two corpora. Other discoursal features such as the representation of self and identity were also inc...
متن کامل.The effect of information resources on the selection of strategies for adaptation to climate change by farmers (Case study: Golestan Province)
Background and Aim: The use of information resources is one of the important strategies in the selection of adaptation strategies to climate change by farmers. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of information resources on the selection of adaptation strategies to climate change by farmers in Golestan province. Method: The research was descriptive and survey. The statistical popu...
متن کاملCompetition of Discourses in Journalistic Translation: Diplomatic Negotiations in Focus
We sought to understand whether, how, and why the translated journalistic texts related to the Iranian nuclear negotiations were manipulated. To this end, we monitored a news agency’s Webpage in a time span of 46 days that began 3 days before Almaty I nuclear talks and ended 3 days after Almaty II talks. Monitoring resulted in a corpus made up of 36 target texts p...
متن کامل